Question: Why, for access limited messages, can no one but the owner see who has access? I assume there must be reasoning behind this decision. As the recipient of a limited access message, it would be really good to know that it is a private message between the writer and myself as opposed to a much less private message between the writer and 100 of their friends.
I guess this had never occurred to me before because, in the past, private messages were separated out as "email" messages. Now those messages are mixed in with all the rest.
It doesn't take much creativity to imagine situations where, thinking it is a private message between two people, you might say something that really should be private only to discover a 3rd, 4th and 5th person in the conversation, causing embarrassment or worse for you and/or the original poster.
