adminsforum@hubzilla.org
dynamic_hubzilladynamic_hubzilla wrote the following post Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:00:09 +0100

Channel used as source for another channel and view from Mastodon

I recently made a post to my primary Hubzilla channel, (dynamic_hubzilla) here: #^https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/channel/dynamic?mid=fb041ab1-3463-4b6a-892f-c3b8689d0caa

I wanted it to be accessible to folks on Mastodon, so I kept the character count below 500 characters and added additional content as replies to the conversation, in the style of Mastodon "thread" posts.

I also have a channel dynamic_backups that cross-posts content from my Hubzilla, Mastodon, and Friendica accounts.  I guess this might have been a bad idea, but it made sense to me at the time to have a channel where I would have everything in one place.

After making my post this morning, I went over to Mastodon to find the post so that I could boost it, but didn't see it in the channels main feed, so I tried switching to Mastodon's "Posts and Replies tab", where I quickly found my most recent reply to the thread/conversation.

What was bizarre was that in the Mastodon view, the reply by dynamic_hubzilla shows up as replying to dynamic_backups, and I can't figure out how to access the original post from Mastodon at all.
Screenshot taken from Mastodon of a Hubzilla post in reply to another Hubzilla post.  The post author is dynamic_hubzilla, but it is listed as in reply to dynamic_backups.

This is definitely not the behavior I want, and I'm not sure how to make sense of it.  Can someone help me understand what is going on here and whether there is any way I can prevent this kind of behavior in the future?

My only immediate thought is that it's a mistake to use a Hubzilla channel as a source for another Hubzilla channel.

Help?

jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
Maybe there's some misunderstanding in what Channel Sources does.

Channel Sources doesn't repeat (boost) content, i.e. it doesn't forward the originals to contacts. Rather, it reposts/shares content. It puts a dumb copy of incoming content into new posts and sends these new posts.
dynamic@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
@Jupiter Rowland, that doesn't really answer my question at all.  My expectation is that a "dumb copy" would *not* show up as the parent for my Hubzilla replies, yet somehow (at least from Mastodon's perspective) that seems to have happened.

I did *not* use dynamic_hubzilla to reply to the dynamic_backups reshare, and yet Mastodon is behaving as if I did.
dynamic@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
Two of my Mastodon followers have confirmed that they are seeing the correct (dynamic_hubzilla) account as the author of one of my recent posts:
#^https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/channel/dynamic?mid=9e2f1094-3219-43e3-9c3f-2fd0d4a59757

My working hypothesis at this point is that what I'm seeing from social.coop has something to do with the fact that that account is also set up as a "source" for dynamics_backups.  I'm not sure that it's actually *functioning* in that capacity, but that is a separate question.

adminsforum@hubzilla.org
dynamic_hubzilladynamic_hubzilla wrote the following post Sun, 20 Oct 2024 18:52:19 +0200

Placement of "expand" link in conversation comments?

In my current view of Hubzilla conversations, if the conversation is too long the older comments are hidden under an "expand" link at the top of the comments.  Is there a way to change my settings so that instead the newer comments are hidden under an "expand" link at the bottom of the comments?

dynamic@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
Just double-checked what this looks like, and I guess the text of the link is actually "Show all _ comments", not "expand," but I still have the same question.
jrp@hub.kliklak.net
@dynamic_hubzilla Why would it be advantageous to change the current behaviour?
dynamic@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
chris@im.allmendenetz.de, I might be missing something, but I don't think that blog style comments is what I want.  I do want the comments to display together with the conversation.

I haven't yet tried adjusting the height, but I assume that that will just change how many comments are visible, not which ones are hidden by the link?